Obama em meias tintas 1 – Apenas cumprindo ordens?

A resposta padrão dos torturadores e exterminadores ainda vale?

Stiglitz e Krugman criticam escolhas da equipa económica de Obama…

…mas o que sabem eles afinal? Até aqui apenas acertaram em tudo o que disseram ou escreveram.

9 Reasons Obama’s Fiscal Plan Fails Both Markets and Taxpayers

By Joseph Stiglitz, Project Syndicate. Posted March 26, 2009.

There is no ”mystique” in finance: The era of believing that something can be created out of nothing should be over. Short-sighted responses by politicians — who hope to get by with a deal that is small enough to please taxpayers and large enough to please the banks — will merely prolong the problem.

An impasse is looming. More money will be needed, but Americans are in no mood to provide it — certainly not on the terms that we have seen. The well of money may be running dry, and so, too, may be America’s legendary optimism and hope.

The Market Wizards Were Exposed as Frauds — Too Bad Obama’s Team Still Believes in Their Magic

By Paul Krugman, The New York Times. Posted March 27, 2009.

Underlying the glamorous new world of finance was the process of securitization. Loans no longer stayed with the lender. Instead, they were sold on to others, who sliced, diced and puréed individual debts to synthesize new assets. Subprime mortgages, credit card debts, car loans — all went into the financial system’s juicer. Out the other end, supposedly, came sweet-tasting AAA investments. And financial wizards were lavishly rewarded for overseeing the process.

But the wizards were frauds, whether they knew it or not, and their magic turned out to be no more than a collection of cheap stage tricks. Above all, the key promise of securitization — that it would make the financial system more robust by spreading risk more widely — turned out to be a lie. Banks used securitization to increase their risk, not reduce it, and in the process they made the economy more, not less, vulnerable to financial disruption.

Sooner or later, things were bound to go wrong, and eventually they did. Bear Stearns failed; Lehman failed; but most of all, securitization failed.

Which brings us back to the Obama administration’s approach to the financial crisis.

Much discussion of the toxic-asset plan has focused on the details and the arithmetic, and rightly so. Beyond that, however, what’s striking is the vision expressed both in the content of the financial plan and in statements by administration officials. In essence, the administration seems to believe that once investors calm down, securitization — and the business of finance — can resume where it left off a year or two ago.

To be fair, officials are calling for more regulation. Indeed, on Thursday Tim Geithner, the Treasury secretary, laid out plans for enhanced regulation that would have been considered radical not long ago.

But the underlying vision remains that of a financial system more or less the same as it was two years ago, albeit somewhat tamed by new rules.

As you can guess, I don’t share that vision. I don’t think this is just a financial panic; I believe that it represents the failure of a whole model of banking, of an overgrown financial sector that did more harm than good. I don’t think the Obama administration can bring securitization back to life, and I don’t believe it should try.

Namibe – conferência socio-antropológica

Ni próximo dia 13 de Abril, pelas 18,00 horas, a Casa de Angola vai levar a efeito, na nossa Sede sita na Trv. da Fábrica das Sedas, nº 7, em Lisboa, uma Conferência sócio-antrpológica subordinada ao tema “MOSSAMEDES -NAMIBE, O BANCO DA PACIÊNCIA”.
 
Será conferencista o Dr. Ildeberto Madeira, um ilustre sociólogo angolano que se encontra de passagem por Lisboa.
 
Agradecemos a Vossa presença e informem Vossos amigos.
 
Deptº Cultural

Casa de Angola (Lisboa)

http://www.casadeangola.org